2003 Subaru R2 vs. 2002 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 993 cc (3 cylinders), 2002 Suzuki Swift is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 52 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru R2 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Swift.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Suzuki Swift (77 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (63 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Suzuki Swift will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Subaru R2 | 2002 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Subaru | Suzuki |
Model | R2 | Swift |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 77 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2270 mm |