2003 Subaru R2 vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1533 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (63 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Subaru R2 | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Subaru | Toyota |
| Model | R2 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 658 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 2313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 99 L |
