2003 Subaru R2 vs. 2006 Holden Captiva
To start off, 2006 Holden Captiva is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 1,899 cc, 2006 Holden Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Captiva (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Captiva should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2006 Holden Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Subaru R2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Captiva (542 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 484 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2006 Holden Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Subaru R2 | 2006 Holden Captiva | |
Make | Subaru | Holden |
Model | R2 | Captiva |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 1899 cc |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Torque | 58 Nm | 542 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1760 mm |