2003 Subaru R2 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 1,964 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2. 2010 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 2003 Subaru R2 has manual transmission. 2003 Subaru R2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Subaru R2 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Subaru | Audi |
Model | R2 | TT |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 58 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |