2003 Subaru R2 vs. 2010 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2010 Jeep Patriot is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Patriot (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jeep Patriot. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Patriot (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Subaru R2 | 2010 Jeep Patriot | |
| Make | Subaru | Jeep |
| Model | R2 | Patriot |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 658 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4409 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2634 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 51 L |
