2003 Subaru R2 vs. 2011 Citroen C3
To start off, 2011 Citroen C3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C3 (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Citroen C3 weights approximately 464 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C3 (136 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Subaru R2 | 2011 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Subaru | Citroen |
| Model | R2 | C3 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 658 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 56 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1334 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |
