2003 Subaru R2 vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (45 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi TT weights approximately 660 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (465 Nm @ 1650 RPM) has 407 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Subaru R2 | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Subaru | Audi |
Model | R2 | TT |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 58 Nm | 465 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 1650 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4199 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1349 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |