2003 Subaru R2 vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Subaru R2 | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Subaru | Nissan |
| Model | R2 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 658 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 68 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2360 mm |
