2003 Suzuki Swift vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2003 Suzuki Swift. (52 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 2003 Suzuki Swift.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Suzuki Swift | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Suzuki | Nissan |
| Model | Swift | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2360 mm |
