2003 Tata Indica vs. 2010 Mazda 6

To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Tata Indica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Tata Indica would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2003 Tata Indica. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Tata Indica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 571 kg more than 2003 Tata Indica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Tata Indica. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Tata Indica. 2010 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 2003 Tata Indica has manual transmission. 2003 Tata Indica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: