2003 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 Holden UTE

To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 115 more horse power than 2003 Toyota 4Runner. (242 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota 4Runner.

Because 2003 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota 4Runner. (382 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota 4Runner. 2003 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: