2003 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 1996 Volvo 960
To start off, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 2,982 cc, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (193 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 960. (168 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo 960 weights approximately 556 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Because 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Volvo 960. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (280 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo 960. (233 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo 960.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | 1996 Volvo 960 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Land Cruiser | 960 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2982 cc | 2472 cc |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 944 kg | 1500 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2780 mm |
