2003 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo V40 would be higher. At 2,982 cc, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo V40 (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (193 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo V40 weights approximately 451 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volvo V40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo V40 (300 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (280 Nm). This means 2000 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Land Cruiser | V40 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1948 cc |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 944 kg | 1395 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 60 L |
