2003 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (193 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Falcon weights approximately 760 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Falcon (391 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (280 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Land Cruiser | Falcon |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 3983 cc |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 391 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 944 kg | 1704 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 68 L |