2003 Toyota Mark II vs. 1996 Toyota Carina

To start off, 2003 Toyota Mark II is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Carina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Carina would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Carina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Carina. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Carina.

Because 2003 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Toyota Carina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Toyota Mark II has automatic transmission and 1996 Toyota Carina has manual transmission. 1996 Toyota Carina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota Mark II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Toyota Mark II 1996 Toyota Carina
Make Toyota Toyota
Model Mark II Carina
Year Released 2003 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1988 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 156 HP 82 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 23.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1420 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.5 L/100km 6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 60 L