2003 Toyota Mark II vs. 2009 Renault Logan
To start off, 2009 Renault Logan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2009 Renault Logan. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 290 kg more than 2009 Renault Logan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Logan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Logan. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Logan. 2003 Toyota Mark II has automatic transmission and 2009 Renault Logan has manual transmission. 2009 Renault Logan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota Mark II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Toyota Mark II | 2009 Renault Logan | |
Make | Toyota | Renault |
Model | Mark II | Logan |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.5 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |