2003 Toyota Tundra vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Tundra would be higher. Both 2003 Toyota Tundra and 2004 Toyota Tundra are equipped with a 3,400 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 187 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 298 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Toyota Tundra | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Tundra | Tundra |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3400 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 3270 mm |