2003 TVR T 350 vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 TVR T 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 TVR T 350 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2003 TVR T 350. (346 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2003 TVR T 350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 TVR T 350. (393 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 TVR T 350.
Compare all specifications:
2003 TVR T 350 | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | TVR | Ford |
Model | T 350 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3605 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 132 L |