2003 Volvo C70 vs. 2012 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2012 Toyota Aygo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (242 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Aygo. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Aygo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 651 kg more than 2012 Toyota Aygo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo C70 (320 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Aygo. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Aygo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Volvo C70 | 2012 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Volvo | Toyota |
Model | C70 | Aygo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2319 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 157 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.5 seconds | 14.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.7 L/100km | 4.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.7 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 35 L |