2003 Volvo S40 vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo S40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo S40 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo S40 (217 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo S40 (330 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Volvo S40 | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Volvo | Opel |
Model | S40 | Combo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2435 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.2 mm | 80.6 mm |
Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.8 seconds | 14 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 52 L |