2003 Volvo V70 vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo V70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo V70 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo V70 (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (154 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda BT-50.

Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Volvo V70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo V70. (340 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo V70.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Volvo V70 2012 Mazda BT-50
Make Volvo Mazda
Model V70 BT-50
Year Released 2003 2012
Body Type Station Wagon Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2520 cc 2953 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 207 HP 154 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 3200 RPM
Torque 340 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 1500 RPM 180 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 96.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93 mm 102 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 3010 mm