2003 Westfield XTR 2 vs. 1999 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 1999 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1999 Volvo C70. (161 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1999 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Volvo C70 weights approximately 960 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | 1999 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Westfield | Volvo |
| Model | XTR 2 | C70 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2670 mm |
