2003 Westfield XTR 2 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Matiz
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | 2010 Chevrolet Matiz | |
| Make | Westfield | Chevrolet |
| Model | XTR 2 | Matiz |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2350 mm |
