2003 Westfield XTR 2 vs. 2010 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XK (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1256 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | 2010 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Westfield | Jaguar |
| Model | XTR 2 | XK |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1696 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4793 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1892 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2751 mm |
