2003 Westfield XTR 2 vs. 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe
To start off, 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe. (121 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe weights approximately 720 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe | |
| Make | Westfield | Mini |
| Model | XTR 2 | Cooper Coupe |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 121 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3729 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2466 mm |
