2003 Westfield ZEI vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield ZEI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield ZEI would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield ZEI (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 631 kg more than 2003 Westfield ZEI.
Because 2003 Westfield ZEI is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield ZEI. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Westfield ZEI | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Westfield | Mazda |
| Model | ZEI | 3 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1298 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1301 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3550 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2639 mm |
