2003 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 985 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 ZAZ Wagon | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | ZAZ | Chevrolet |
Model | Wagon | Captiva |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2710 mm |