2003 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2010 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Passat (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Passat should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Passat weights approximately 822 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 ZAZ Wagon | 2010 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | ZAZ | Volkswagen |
Model | Wagon | Passat |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1567 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4775 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2710 mm |