2003 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Wagon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2003 ZAZ Wagon has manual transmission. 2003 ZAZ Wagon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 ZAZ Wagon | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | ZAZ | Chevrolet |
| Model | Wagon | Malibu |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1091 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2852 mm |
