2004 AC Aceca vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 AC Aceca weights approximately 375 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 AC Aceca | 1951 Riley RM A | |
Make | AC | Riley |
Model | Aceca | RM A |
Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2870 mm |