2004 AC Aceca vs. 1953 Buick 40
To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1953 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1953 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2004 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Buick 40. (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2004 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2004 AC Aceca | 1953 Buick 40 | |
Make | AC | Buick |
Model | Aceca | 40 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 4315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 304 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 80.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3090 mm |