2004 AC Aceca vs. 1958 DKW 600
To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Because 2004 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 2004 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 AC Aceca | 1958 DKW 600 | |
| Make | AC | DKW |
| Model | Aceca | 600 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3504 cc | 671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
