2004 AC Aceca vs. 1966 Alpine A
To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 AC Aceca weights approximately 885 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 AC Aceca | 1966 Alpine A | |
| Make | AC | Alpine |
| Model | Aceca | A |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 38 L |
