2004 AC Aceca vs. 1984 BMW M6
To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 BMW M6 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (301 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1984 BMW M6. (286 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1984 BMW M6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 AC Aceca weights approximately 4 kg more than 1984 BMW M6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 AC Aceca (407 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 BMW M6. (334 Nm). This means 2004 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 BMW M6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 AC Aceca | 1984 BMW M6 | |
| Make | AC | BMW |
| Model | Aceca | M6 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3453 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 286 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1506 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2840 mm |
