2004 AC Aceca vs. 1992 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 2004 AC Aceca. (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2004 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 AC Aceca weights approximately 188 kg more than 1992 Jaguar XJ220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 AC Aceca. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2004 AC Aceca | 1992 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | AC | Jaguar |
Model | Aceca | XJ220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 3492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 642 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2650 mm |