2004 AC Aceca vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 220 kg more than 2004 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2004 AC Aceca | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Aceca | Challenger |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2730 mm |