2004 AC Aceca vs. 1998 BMW V12
To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 2004 AC Aceca. (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2004 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW V12 weights approximately 4 kg more than 2004 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 509 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 AC Aceca. (400 Nm). This means 1998 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2004 AC Aceca | 1998 BMW V12 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Aceca | V12 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 570 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 909 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1614 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2790 mm |