2004 AC Aceca vs. 1999 Audi R8R
To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi R8R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi R8R would be higher. At 3,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Audi R8R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1999 Audi R8R. (247 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi R8R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 AC Aceca weights approximately 1608 kg more than 1999 Audi R8R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi R8R. (330 Nm). This means 2004 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi R8R.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 AC Aceca | 1999 Audi R8R | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Aceca | R8R |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3504 cc | 3898 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1090 mm |
