2004 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 156 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 280 kg more than 2004 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2004 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 AC Aceca | 2000 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Aceca | Blazer |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 57 L |