2004 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Mini MK VII

To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 2000 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2000 Mini MK VII. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 AC Aceca weights approximately 875 kg more than 2000 Mini MK VII. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mini MK VII, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2004 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mini MK VII.

Compare all specifications: