2004 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 AC Aceca is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 830 kg more than 2004 AC Aceca.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (439 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 AC Aceca. (400 Nm). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2004 AC Aceca | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | AC | Land Rover |
Model | Aceca | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 439 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2550 mm |