2004 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (191 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2004 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2004 AC Aceca | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Aceca | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 191 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 72 L |