2004 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (395 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2004 AC Aceca. (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Mustang. (240 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2004 AC Aceca | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Mustang |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 55 L |