2004 AC Aceca vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 190 more horse power than 2011 Peugeot RCZ. (156 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2011 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 2004 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 AC Aceca | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | AC | Peugeot |
| Model | Aceca | RCZ |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3504 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1359 mm |
