2004 AC Aceca vs. 2013 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Express is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Express. (260 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 751 kg more than 2004 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 AC Aceca | 2013 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Aceca | Express |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 6600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2361 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5692 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2012 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2070 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3429 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 117 L |