2004 AC Aceca vs. 2013 GMC Yukon

To start off, 2013 GMC Yukon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2013 GMC Yukon. (327 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2013 GMC Yukon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Yukon weights approximately 929 kg more than 2004 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Yukon (498 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 AC Aceca. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 AC Aceca.

Compare all specifications:

2004 AC Aceca 2013 GMC Yukon
Make AC GMC
Model Aceca Yukon
Year Released 2004 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3504 cc 6000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 346 HP 327 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 498 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 101 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81 mm 92 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 2539 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 5131 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 2007 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1954 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2946 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 93 L