2004 Acura CL vs. 1970 Jaguar Type E
To start off, 2004 Acura CL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jaguar Type E (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Acura CL. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jaguar Type E should accelerate faster than 2004 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura CL weights approximately 180 kg more than 1970 Jaguar Type E.
Because 1970 Jaguar Type E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Jaguar Type E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura CL | 1970 Jaguar Type E | |
Make | Acura | Jaguar |
Model | CL | Type E |
Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2450 mm |