2004 Acura CL vs. 2002 Acura RSX
To start off, 2004 Acura CL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 223 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura CL weights approximately 350 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura CL (294 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 2004 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura CL | 2002 Acura RSX | |
Make | Acura | Acura |
Model | CL | RSX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 193 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |