2004 Acura EL vs. 1964 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2004 Acura EL is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 960 kg more than 2004 Acura EL.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura EL | 1964 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | EL | DeVille |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2050 mm |