2004 Acura EL vs. 1970 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2004 Acura EL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,668 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura EL weights approximately 327 kg more than 1970 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura EL | 1970 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Acura | Zastava |
| Model | EL | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 1668 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2010 mm |
